ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Thermal and Mechanical Performance of Steel Slag and Graphite Modified Concrete with a Comparative Engineering Cost Assessment.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The heat generated by electrical cables during operation dissipates through the duct and surrounding encasement concrete into the adjacent soil. Consequently, the thermal conductivity of the encasement concrete is critical for the overall heat dissipation efficiency and thermal stability of the cable system. To address this, a high-thermal-conductivity concrete was developed by incorporating steel slag powder, graphite powder, and graphite particles. This study systematically investigated the effects of mineral admixture content, graphite powder dosage, and the replacement ratio of conductive aggregates on the thermal conductivity, mechanical properties, and workability of the concrete. Additionally, the economic performance was evaluated against conventional C25 concrete using value engineering methodology. The results demonstrate that the proposed concrete exhibited significantly improved thermal performance compared to ordinary concrete. Notably, with a 10% replacement of aggregates by graphite particles, the 28-day thermal conductivity increased by 106.16% relative to the control mix. Simultaneously, the compressive strength reached 25.1 MPa, ensuring sufficient mechanical integrity. Furthermore, the value coefficient of the developed concrete was 18.31% higher than that of conventional C25 concrete. These findings highlight the material's potential in power engineering and energy-efficient construction, providing a valuable reference for material design in these fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.