Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41597935›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Bone-Healing Enhancement Using Particulate Biomaterials and Fibrin-Based Compounds: A Narrative Literature Review of Evidence in Animal Models.

Lívia Maluf Menegazzo Bueno, Camila Pascoal Correia Dos Santos, Paola Tatiana Espinosa Cruel, Gabriela Romanini, Lithiene Ribeiro Castilho Padula, Cindel Regina Dos Santos Oliveira, Daniela Vieira Buchaim, Rogerio Leone Buchaim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lívia Maluf Menegazzo BuenoMedical and Dentistry School, University Center of Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina 17800-000, Brazil.
Camila Pascoal Correia Dos SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB-USP), University of São Paulo, Bauru 17012-901, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-3777-3298
Paola Tatiana Espinosa CruelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB-USP), University of São Paulo, Bauru 17012-901, Brazil.
Gabriela RomaniniMedical and Dentistry School, University Center of Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina 17800-000, Brazil.
Lithiene Ribeiro Castilho PadulaMedical and Dentistry School, University Center of Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina 17800-000, Brazil.
Cindel Regina Dos Santos OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Science, Children's Oral Health, Araçatuba School of Dentistry (FOA-UNESP), São Paulo State University, Araçatuba 16015-050, Brazil.
Daniela Vieira BuchaimMedical and Dentistry School, University Center of Adamantina (FAI), Adamantina 17800-000, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-9914-1262
Rogerio Leone BuchaimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Bauru School of Dentistry (FOB-USP), University of São Paulo, Bauru 17012-901, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5881-2218

Funding

National Council for Scientific and Technological Development 302545/2025-5
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human body's ability to recover from bone injuries is remarkable; however, in specific conditions, interventions are required to restore function and prevent complications. To accelerate osteogenesis, several strategies have been explored, including grafts, biomaterials, and adjuvant therapies. The aim of this narrative review was to analyze the preclinical evidence regarding the combination of particulate biomaterials and fibrin derivatives for bone regeneration. Publications using hydroxyapatite, bovine bone, β-tricalcium phosphate, and bioglass in association with fibrin glue, heterologous fibrin sealants, or platelet-rich fibrin were examined to identify recurrent experimental patterns and biological outcomes. According to the studies, hydroxyapatite and bovine bone were the most frequently investigated scaffolds, whereas fibrin glue and heterologous fibrin sealants showed consistent adhesion and favorable host response profiles in animal models. β-tricalcium phosphate demonstrated faster remodeling but lower volumetric stability, and bioglass showed high bioactivity in isolated reports. Despite heterogeneity in particle size, fibrin formulations, defect models, and follow-up periods, most studies reported enhanced bone deposition, vascularization, and integration when particulate biomaterials were combined with fibrin-based matrices. Overall, the evidence suggests that these combinations promote more organized and biologically favorable bone healing under experimental conditions. Future translational and clinical research is required to standardize protocols and determine the therapeutic applicability of these strategies in human bone repair.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbone regenerationbone substitutesfibrin tissue adhesivehydroxyapatitesparticulate matterscaffoldstissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID41597935
PMCPMC12843291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.