ArticleMicromachines2026
The Influence of Mask Modification on Microneedle Strength in Deep X-Ray Lithography.
Article in Micromachines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hollow microneedle arrays of different shapes were prepared for blood collection and precise drug delivery. This microneedle array was investigated using shape modification and hole position optimization, and different approaches to increase the strength of the microneedles and hole alignment were analyzed. Firstly, solid-tip microneedles were prepared using deep X-ray lithography, and an approach to increase the strength of microneedles by modifying the shape of the photomask was examined. Secondly, photomasks with holes in different positions were designed, and the exposure was aligned at different hole positions. Finally, the maximum stress and minimum displacement were analyzed using ANSYS 10.0 simulation software, while the proof-of-strength properties were accomplished by inserting microneedles into a polyimide film. The experimental results show that the modification of the shape of the photomask can increase the strength of the microneedles and compensate for the shortcomings generated by the moving exposure. Placing the holes away from the center of the tip can increase the flow rate of the microneedles. A horizontal offset of 30 μm and a vertical offset of 50 μm from the center of the microneedle tip were determined to be the best positions for aligning the holes. This meets the requirements for microneedle strength and sharpness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.