ReviewMicromachines2025
Paper-Based Microfluidic Devices: A Powerful Strategy for Rapid Detection.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Microfluidic-Integrated CRISPR-Cas Biosensor for Marine Pollutant and Pathogen Monitoring: A Review.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Molecularly imprinted polymer ZnO nanostructures derived fromRSC advances · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, diseases, environmental pollution, and food safety issues have seriously threatened global health, generating international concern. Many existing detection strategies used to deal with the above problems have high accuracy and sensitivity, but usually rely on large-sized, complex instruments and professional technicians, which are not suitable for on-site testing. Therefore, it is imperative to develop highly sensitive, rapid, and portable analytical methods. Recently, microfluidic paper-based analytical devices (μPADs) have been recognized as a highly promising microfluidic device substrate to deal with the issues existing in medical, environmental, and food safety, etc., due to their advantages, including environmental-friendliness, high flexibility, low cost, and mature technology. This review comprehensively summarizes the recent advances in μPADs. We first overview the development of paper-based materials and their core fabrication techniques, followed by a detailed discussion on the material selection and detection mechanisms of the devices. The review also provides an assessment of the application achievements of μPADs in medical diagnostics, environmental analysis, and food safety monitoring. Finally, current challenges in the field are summarized and future research directions and prospects are proposed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.