ArticleMicromachines2025
Structure Optimization of Polymerase Chain Reaction Devices Under High Flow Rate: A Numerical Study.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is vital in biological and medical research, but microfluidic PCR chips often suffer from limited reagent processing capacity and slow thermal response under high flow rates. To address this, we designed three serpentine microfluidic chips with double-sided heaters: a standard serpentine chip (case 1), one with unchamfered channel expansion areas (case 2), and one with chamfered expansions (case 3). Using numerical simulations, we analyzed temperature, velocity, and pressure distributions at flow rates of 75, 125, and 175 μL/min. At 175 μL/min, case 2 showed a 41% higher pressure drop than case 1, but also demonstrated significantly improved thermal performance: the constant-temperature zones were extended by 30 mm, 10 mm, and 30 mm at 95 °C, 72 °C, and 55 °C, respectively; the temperature gradient in expansion zones increased by 1.6 times; and the maximum temperature difference decreased by 80%. Case 2 achieved the best trade-off between thermal performance and flow resistance, making it suitable for high-flow-rate PCR applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.