Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41597790›Full record

ArticleMicromachines2025

Effect of Punch Geometry on Stress and Strain Distribution During Contact Lens Demolding.

Ching-Mu Cheng, Yun-Shao Cho, Tieh-Fei Cheng, Jui-Yu Wang, Jung-Jie Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ching-Mu ChengDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua 515006, Taiwan.
Yun-Shao ChoDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Da-Yeh University, Changhua 515006, Taiwan.
Tieh-Fei ChengHenghau Enterprise Company Limited, Hsinchu 303117, Taiwan.
Jui-Yu WangGraduate School of Engineering Science and Technology, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640301, Taiwan.
Jung-Jie HuangDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Asia University, Taichung 413305, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-0875

Funding

National Science and Technology Council of Taiwan 113-2622-E-212-002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study optimized the punch-assisted demolding technique for the separation of contact lenses, incorporating finite-element analysis to evaluate the effects of punch geometry (punch material: 304L stainless steel) on the stress and strain distributions of polypropylene lens molds. The simulation results revealed that the punch surface featured a flat base with a central arc-shaped groove (groove diameter: 7 mm, depth: 0.75 mm), which exhibited optimal stress dispersion characteristics during the demolding process, effectively reducing mold deformation. Experimental validation over 100 demolding cycles confirmed that the use of the aforementioned punch resulted in the manufactured lens having high central stability and reduced van der Waals forces during demolding, allowing smoother lens release and facilitating improved demolding performance. Comprehensive evaluation based on defect inspection and centering stability indicated that a yield of 82% was achieved with the optimized punch, with this yield being 13% higher than that obtained with a flat punch lacking an arc groove (69%). These results indicate that the optimized punch design not only reduces development costs but also enhances manufacturing yield and throughput, demonstrating strong potential for application in contact lens production.

Indexed as

contact lensdemolding stressfinite element analysisprocess yieldpunch-assisted demolding

Identifiers

PMID41597790
PMCPMC12844106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.