ReviewMicroorganisms2026
Prevalence of Fungemia in People with HIV: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior to the introduction of antiretroviral therapy (ART), people with HIV (PWH) had high risk of fungemia. No systematic review has assessed the prevalence of fungemia in PWH after the introduction of combination ART in 1996. The primary objective of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of fungemia in adult PWH after 1996. Furthermore, we aimed to compare the prevalence of fungemia in different ART time periods to determine geographic differences and fungal pathogen distribution. A systematic literature search was performed on 7 March 2025 across six databases and the study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Prevalence estimates were extracted, and a meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. Twelve studies comprising 27,729 PWH were included. The overall pooled prevalence in PWH was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.53; 4.96%, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.