Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41597571›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2025

Probiotics for Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Cancer: A Systematic Review of Animal and Human Studies with Mechanistic Insights.

Zahra Amirkhanzadeh Barandouzi, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Yufen Lin, Hannah Choi, Layla R Zeki, Tobi Akangbe, Amruta Epari, Hongjin Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zahra Amirkhanzadeh BarandouziSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8537-4751
Deborah Watkins BrunerSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Yufen LinSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-2928
Hannah ChoiCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-7969
Layla R ZekiCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Tobi AkangbeSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Amruta EpariSchool of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Hongjin LiCollege of Nursing, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5466-1192

Funding

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health UL1TR002378Pediatric and Reproductive Environmental Health Scholars Southeastern Environmental Exposures and Disparities (PREHS SEED) Program 5K12ES033593-04
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics have been increasingly evaluated for their potential effect on anxiety and depression through the modulation of the gut-brain axis. Individuals with cancer experience a high prevalence of these symptoms. However, the effects of probiotics and their underlying mechanisms in this population have not been systematically evaluated. This review synthesizes current evidence regarding probiotic interventions for anxiety and depression in cancer and examines the associated mechanistic pathways. A systematic search for original trials in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and PsycINFO was conducted in May 2025. Eligible studies included animal models or adults with cancer who received probiotics alone or in combination with other treatments, with outcomes related to anxiety, depressive symptoms, or depression. Search terms included animal model, cancer, probiotics, anxiety, depressive symptoms, depression, gastrointestinal microbiome, gut microbiome, and microbiota. The review followed PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias in trials was assessed using the SYRCLE and Cochrane RoB2 tool. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, including seven human studies, one animal study, and one mixed human-animal study, with human sample sizes ranging from 24 to 266. The animal study reported reductions in depressive and anxiety-like behaviors, paralleled by modulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, reduced inflammation, rebalancing of the gut microbiota, and improvements in neurotransmitter pathways. Findings from human studies were more variable. Some trials reported improvements in anxiety, and depressive symptoms, while others showed no significant differences compared with control groups. Studies that combined probiotics with antidepressants or exercise demonstrated the most pronounced reductions in anxiety and depression. Mechanistic insights from human studies partially aligned with animal evidence, with several trials showing reductions in inflammatory markers (IL-6, TNF-α), improvements in neuroendocrine measures (serotonin, dopamine, cortisol), stabilization of metabolic markers, and favorable shifts in gut microbiota, although these effects were not consistent across all studies. Probiotics appear to be safe within the intervention periods of the reviewed studies (<24 weeks), as no serious adverse effects were reported. Substantial heterogeneity across studies, including variations in cancer type, intervention duration, probiotic strains, formulations, dosages, and study design combined with small sample sizes, restricts the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Rigorously designed randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and mechanistic biomarkers are required to confirm the efficacy of probiotics for relieving anxiety and depression in the cancer population.

Indexed as

anxietycancerdepressiondepressive symptomskefirprobiotics

Identifiers

PMID41597571
PMCPMC12843756

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.