ArticleMicroorganisms2025
Estimating Postmortem Interval of Buried Pig Carcasses by Integrating Microbial Succession Patterns with Machine Learning Algorithms.
Article in Microorganisms, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence in forensic science: a systematic review. Part II: long-range postmortem interval estimation.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Estimation of postmortem submersion interval based on microbial community composition in human remains recovered from aquatic environments.Journal of forensic sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Microbial succession serves as a promising tool for estimating the postmortem interval (PMI). However, the patterns of microbial succession in burial scenarios require further exploration. This study established a pig carcass model, including buried and surface (control) groups, to investigate this. Using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing, we analyzed microbial community changes and their differences across various decomposition stages. Results indicated that the decomposition rate of buried carcasses was slower than that of surface carcasses. Following the early decomposition stages, the alpha diversity of skin and underlying soil samples from buried carcasses decreased, a trend similar to that observed in the surface group. A significant shift in bacterial communities occurred in the buried group during abdominal rupture, mirroring the pattern in the surface group. At the phylum level, the relative abundance of Proteobacteria in the skin and soil of the buried group increased during later stages, consistent with the surface group. Furthermore, the buried and surface groups each possessed unique microbial taxa that responded to PMI changes. Using genus-level data, we identified feature taxa and constructed Random Forest models for PMI estimation. In the buried group, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 5.47 days for skin and 4.91 days for soil, while in the surface group, it was 5.59 days for skin and 5.30 days for soil. Although the model's generalizability is currently limited by the sample size, the results demonstrate the predictability of microbial succession across different environmental contexts, underscoring its potential as a tool for PMI estimation in buried remains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.