ArticleCells2026
The Spatial Signature of Glioblastoma: A Statistical Re-Assessment of Anatomical Distribution Based on Methylation Subtypes.
Article in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise molecular characterization of glioblastoma (GB) is fundamental for accurate risk stratification and therapeutic planning. DNA methylation profiling reliably identifies key molecular features, including O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status and specific molecular subtypes, such as receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) I and II, and the mesenchymal (MES) subtype. In this study, we investigated the hypothesized correlation between these molecular profiles and preferential tumor locations, which could reveal a link to underlying tumor biology. We analyzed 227 GB patients characterized by DNA methylation profiling. To map significant clusters of tumor occurrence across subtypes and subcomponents, we performed voxel-wise analysis of differential involvement, utilizing 500 permutations to correct for multiple comparisons. While uncorrected frequency differential maps suggested localization tendencies for the RTK I, RTK II, and MES subtypes, stringent statistical correction revealed only one robust association: the non-enhancing component of MES tumors showed significant clustering in the left frontal lobe, the insula, and the temporal lobe. Contrary to prior literature, we observed no significant hemispheric preference regarding MGMT promoter methylation status. Our findings challenge prior assumptions regarding the spatial distinctiveness of GB subtypes and highlight the need to further elucidate the mechanisms governing tumorigenesis and spatial growth patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.