ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Targeting CRHR1 Signaling in Experimental Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome: Evidence for Route-Dependent Efficacy.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesInfantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS) is a severe epilepsy of infancy. Corticotropin (ACTH) and vigabatrin are the only FDA-approved therapies. The efficacy of ACTH together with the strong convulsant effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) suggests that excess CRH, secondary to impaired ACTH feedback, may contribute to spasms. We therefore hypothesized that CRH receptor 1 (CRHR1) antagonists would suppress spasms in a route- and drug-dependent manner.
methodsUsing our validated rat model of IESS, in which prenatal priming with betamethasone was followed by postnatal triggering of spasms with N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA), we tested two CRHR1 antagonists, CP376395 and SN003, delivered intracranially (via intracerebroventricular or intraparenchymal infusion) or systemically.
resultsIntracerebroventricular infusion of both antagonists suppressed spasms, with CP376395 providing more consistent effects. Intraparenchymal administration into the hypothalamic arcuate nucleus also reduced spasms, whereas misses into the mammillary bodies were ineffective, highlighting site specificity. Systemic administration yielded divergent results: SN003 robustly suppressed spasms, whereas CP376395 unexpectedly exacerbated them. No sex differences were observed.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that CRHR1 blockade modifies experimental spasms in a route- and drug-specific manner and implicates discrete hypothalamic circuits, particularly those including the arcuate nucleus, in spasm generation. The divergent systemic responses between CP376395 and SN003 likely reflect differences in CRHR1 engagement (competitive and non-competitive antagonism, respectively) as well as differences in binding properties that may include differential network interactions beyond local CRH signaling or duration of receptor occupancy. In conclusion, SN003 may be a better option than CP376395 for further development as a CRHR1-targeted therapy pending additional pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies. Further work should explore dosing paradigms of CP376395 to determine if a therapeutic range for CP376395 exists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.