ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Motorized Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail for Reconstruction of a Large Diaphyseal Bone Defect after Tumor Resection in a Child-A Case Report.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReconstructing large bone defects in pediatric patients after tumor resection is challenging, as conventional techniques are associated with high complication rates and morbidity. The Intramedullary Bone Transport Nail (IMBTN) may reduce these complications while preserving limb alignment and skeletal growth in pediatric oncologic reconstruction.
methodsA 15-year-old female with an osteofibrous dysplasia-like adamantinoma of the tibial diaphysis underwent complete en-bloc resection, leaving a 9 cm bone defect. An IMBTN (Precice, NuVasive) was implanted for distraction osteogenesis, with distraction starting eight days post-surgery at 0.25 mm twice daily. Follow-up visits monitored bone healing, alignment, and limb length.
resultsThe 9 cm defect was successfully reconstructed, with complete bone healing at the distraction site. Complete consolidation was confirmed at 18 months. The transport nail was removed at two years, and no further revisions were necessary. At two-year follow-up, the patient reported minimal pain on the Visual Analog Scale 1/10, and no recurrence of the tumor was noted.
conclusionsThe use of IMBTN for large bone defect reconstruction following tumor resection in pediatric patients is a safe and effective technique. It enables stable bone transport while preserving alignment, maintaining limb length, and is less invasive than traditional reconstructive approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.