Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41596987›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Honey Botanical Origin Authentication Using HS-SPME-GC-MS Volatile Profiling and Advanced Machine Learning Models (Random Forest, XGBoost, and Neural Network).

Amir Pourmoradian, Mohsen Barzegar, Ángel A Carbonell-Barrachina, Luis Noguera-Artiaga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir PourmoradianDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran P.O. Box 14115-336, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9191-8244
Mohsen BarzegarDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran P.O. Box 14115-336, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6811-5566
Ángel A Carbonell-BarrachinaGrupo de Investigación "Calidad y Seguridad Alimentaria", Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Carretera de Beniel, km 3.2, 03312 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7163-2975
Luis Noguera-ArtiagaGrupo de Investigación "Calidad y Seguridad Alimentaria", Instituto de Investigación e Innovación Agroalimentaria y Agroambiental (CIAGRO-UMH), Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche, Carretera de Beniel, km 3.2, 03312 Alicante, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9269-1125

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops a comprehensive workflow integrating Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) with advanced supervised machine learning to authenticate the botanical origin of honeys from five distinct floral sources-coriander, orange blossom, astragalus, rosemary, and chehelgiah. While HS-SPME-GC-MS combined with traditional chemometrics (e.g., PCA, LDA, OPLS-DA) is well-established for honey discrimination, the application and direct comparison of Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Neural Network (NN) models represent a significant advancement in multiclass prediction accuracy and model robustness. A total of 57 honey samples were analyzed to generate detailed volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles. Key chemotaxonomic markers were identified: anethole in coriander and chehelgiah, thymoquinone in astragalus, p-menth-8-en-1-ol in orange blossom, and dill ester (3,6-dimethyl-2,3,3a,4,5,7a-hexahydrobenzofuran) in rosemary. Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed clear separation across botanical classes (PC1: 49.8%; PC2: 22.6%). Three classification models-RF, XGBoost, and NN-were trained on standardized, stratified data. The NN model achieved the highest accuracy (90.32%), followed by XGBoost (86.69%) and RF (83.47%), with superior per-class F1-scores and near-perfect specificity (>0.95). Confusion matrices confirmed minimal misclassification, particularly in the NN model. This work establishes HS-SPME-GC-MS coupled with deep learning as a rapid, sensitive, and reliable tool for multiclass honey botanical authentication, offering strong potential for real-time quality control, fraud detection, and premium market certification.

Indexed as

botanical originchemometricschromatographyGC—MShoney authenticationneural networkvolatile compounds

Identifiers

PMID41596987
PMCPMC12841070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.