ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Production of Gluten-Free Craft Beers of High Antioxidant and Sensory Quality.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Usually, gluten-free "beers" are produced by replacing cereals containing gluten with substitutes that do not contain it or, alternatively, through enzymatic, precipitation, and/or clarification steps. The research was aimed at increasing the concentration of antioxidant compounds and improving the sensory quality of gluten-free craft beers produced from gluten-containing raw materials according to a patented brewing method that represented the starting point of the research. The experiments were organized to evaluate the effects of original combinations of four brewing procedures (Strong, Light, Very Light, Ultra-Light-differing from each other by grains/water ratio, hops/water ratio, protein rest, and boiling time), three yeast strains (M21, K97, S33), and a possible dry hopping. The beer gluten contents ranged from <5 to 13.90 mg/L. The maximum total phenolic content (200 mg/L) was detected in beers produced by combining the Light procedure, inoculation with M21 strain, and dry hopping. The highest overall sensory quality scores (4.0) were assigned to the beers obtained through the Light and Ultra-Light procedures, fermented by M21 and S33 strains, and dry hopped. Dry hopping was the main factor capable of differentiating the beers, increasing antioxidant content and improving perlage, foam characteristics, the intensity of many olfactory and gustatory characteristics, and the overall sensory quality. The brewing procedure affected all the physico-chemical indices and most sensory characteristics, except for color, citrous and spicy flavors, sweetness, effervescence, and body. The use of different yeasts did not impart significant differences for most of the variables considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.