ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Upcycled Foods: What Influences Consumer Responses to a Circular Economy-Based Consumption Strategy? Insights from a Systematic Literature Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chokeberry Pomace as a Source of Polyphenols for Complexation with Plant-Based Proteins.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Fruit and Vegetable By-Products as Postharvest Tissue Fractions: A Raw-Material Framework for Plant-Based Food Development.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bioactive Compounds from Agro-Industrial By-Products: Green Recovery Technologies, Analytical Characterization, and Industrial Applications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Reutilization of berry by-products for green food additives: a comprehensive review and future perspectives.NPJ science of food · 2026Review
- AI virtual streamers in sustainable food marketing: how expertise, interactivity, and anthropomorphism shape consumer acceptance of upcycled foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Understanding purchase intention toward upcycled foods through a consumer education lens: an extended theory of planned behavior approach.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- When parasocial relationships meet food technology neophobia: understanding consumer responses to virtual influencer marketing of upcycled foods.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Upcycled foods (UFs) are foods that are produced from ingredients that would otherwise be wasted and are considered a sustainable solution to the issue of food waste. However, since consumers' responses to these foods will ultimately determine their success, there is a need to identify the factors that affect such responses. This systematic review is intended to contribute to fulfilling this need. A literature search was conducted in Scopus on 10 July 2025. Following the PRISMA protocol and setting selected inclusion criteria (scientific papers on consumer evaluation of UFs published since 2010 in English), 54 research articles (83 studies) were analyzed. The findings are discussed through the lens of the Total Food Quality model, where product cues, combined with consumers' characteristics and perceptions, develop consumers' ultimate responses, such as general attitude (analyzed in 91.7% of the reviewed studies), purchase intention (77.4%), sensory evaluation (69.2%), and willingness to pay (66.7%). Despite the general positive consumer attitudes toward UFs, translation into actual purchasing behavior is not immediate, and consumer awareness appears to be a major obstacle. However, the analysis of the literature suggests promising strategies to widen the acceptance and consumption of UFs. These entail the use, for example, of informational tools (e.g., claims and certifications), which can be differentiated to target consumers with different levels of knowledge and appreciation of UFs. In addition, targeting specific consumer segments (e.g., environmentalists) can promote a faster acceptance and spread of UFs, while providing information about the nature of UFs will likely help to reduce relevant barriers, such as price sensitivity, risk aversion, and food and technology neophobia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.