Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41596843›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Risk Assessment of Chemical Mixtures in Foods: A Comprehensive Methodological and Regulatory Review.

Rosana González Combarros, Mariano González-García, Gerardo David Blanco-Díaz, Kharla Segovia Bravo, José Luis Reino Moya, José Ignacio López-Sánchez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Risk Assessment in Food Safety.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rosana González CombarrosEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-308X
Mariano González-GarcíaEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5617-493X
Gerardo David Blanco-DíazEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2846-0362
Kharla Segovia BravoEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1174-019X
José Luis Reino MoyaEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9922-2054
José Ignacio López-SánchezEscuela Superior de Ingeniería y Tecnología (ESIT), Universidad Internacional de La Rioja-UNIR, Avenida de la Paz, 137, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-7379

Funding

Universidad Internacional De La Rioja AGROTOXIA:
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last 15 years, mixture risk assessment for food xenobiotics has evolved from conceptual discussions and simple screening tools, such as the Hazard Index (HI), towards operational, component-based and probabilistic frameworks embedded in major food-safety institutions. This review synthesizes methodological and regulatory advances in cumulative risk assessment for dietary "cocktails" of pesticides, contaminants and other xenobiotics, with a specific focus on food-relevant exposure scenarios. At the toxicological level, the field is now anchored in concentration/dose addition as the default model for similarly acting chemicals, supported by extensive experimental evidence that most environmental mixtures behave approximately dose-additively at low effect levels. Building on this paradigm, a portfolio of quantitative metrics has been developed to operationalize component-based mixture assessment: HI as a conservative screening anchor; Relative Potency Factors (RPF) and Toxic Equivalents (TEQ) to express doses within cumulative assessment groups; the Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR) to diagnose whether risk is dominated by one or several components; and the combined Margin of Exposure (MOET) as a point-of-departure-based integrator that avoids compounding uncertainty factors. Regulatory frameworks developed by EFSA, the U.S. EPA and FAO/WHO converge on tiered assessment schemes, biologically informed grouping of chemicals and dose addition as the default model for similarly acting substances, while differing in scope, data infrastructure and legal embedding. Implementation in food safety critically depends on robust exposure data streams. Total Diet Studies provide population-level, "as eaten" exposure estimates through harmonized food-list construction, home-style preparation and composite sampling, and are increasingly combined with conventional monitoring. In parallel, human biomonitoring quantifies internal exposure to diet-related xenobiotics such as PFAS, phthalates, bisphenols and mycotoxins, embedding mixture assessment within a dietary-exposome perspective. Across these developments, structured uncertainty analysis and decision-oriented communication have become indispensable. By integrating advances in toxicology, exposure science and regulatory practice, this review outlines a coherent, tiered and uncertainty-aware framework for assessing real-world dietary mixtures of xenobiotics, and identifies priorities for future work, including mechanistically and data-driven grouping strategies, expanded use of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling and refined mixture-sensitive indicators to support public-health decision-making.

Indexed as

combined exposurecombined MOE (MOET)EFSAEPAhazard index (HI)human biomonitoring (HBM)margin of exposure (MOE)Maximum Cumulative Ratio (MCR)mixture risk assessmentrelative potency factor (RPF)Total Diet Studies (TDS)toxic equivalents (TEQ)uncertainty communicationWHO/FAO

Identifiers

PMID41596843
PMCPMC12839768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.