ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
BCL-2 and BCL-xL in Cancer: Regulation, Function, and Therapeutic Targeting.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Venetoclax for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukaemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy: Prospects, resistance mechanisms and management strategies.Clinical and translational medicine · 2026Review
- Host immune network-guided reverse vaccinology approach for prioritizing candidate antigens in Schistosoma japonicum-associated liver fibrosis.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Differential Effects of PERK and IRE1α Silencing on Expression of Apoptosis and Autophagy Markers in T-Lymphoblastic Leukemia MOLT-3 Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Curcumin and Its Derivatives as Anticancer Agents in Head and Neck Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms and Preclinical Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Cadmium-Induced Apoptosis in Fish Cells: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The BCL-2 family of proteins plays a central role in the regulation of apoptosis, with BCL-2 and BCL-xL representing two of its most prominent antiapoptotic members. This review explores the molecular regulation of BCL-2 and BCL-xL genes, emphasizing the structural domains that define the functions of the broader BCL-2 family. Beyond their canonical roles in preventing mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, both proteins contribute significantly to cancer development. Their overexpression enhances invasiveness and tumor progression, supports angiogenesis, and critically modulates cellular responses to chemotherapy, often conferring drug resistance. Additional non-apoptotic functions, including roles in metabolism, mitochondrial dynamics, and cellular homeostasis, further expand their biological relevance. Clinical trials exploring strategies to inhibit BCL-2 and BCL-xL, including selective BH3 mimetics and combination regimens, are discussed with emphasis on their potential and limitations in oncology. Overall, this review highlights the multifaceted contributions of BCL-2 and BCL-xL to cancer biology and underscores the importance of continued efforts to refine targeted therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.