ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Cell Lines in Myelodysplastic Syndromes/Neoplasms (MDS) Research: A Review of Existing Models and Their Applications.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelodysplastic syndromes/neoplasms (MDS) are clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by ineffective hematopoiesis, cytopenias, and a variable risk of progression to secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Despite major advances in the molecular and clinical characterization of MDS, mechanistic and translational research remains constrained by the limited availability of well-validated in vitro models. Many historically used cell lines are difficult to maintain, exhibit restricted proliferative capacity, or represent advanced disease stages rather than bona fide MDS, while others have been affected by misidentification or cross-contamination. This review provides a comprehensive and critical overview of currently available MDS and MDS-related cell lines, including MDS92, MDS-L and its sublines, M-TAT, TER-3, SKK-1, SKM-1, and MOLM-17/18. We summarize their clinical origin, cytogenetic and molecular features, growth factor dependence, differentiation capacity, and experimental applications, with particular emphasis on their relevance to disease stage, clonal evolution, and leukemic transformation. In addition, we discuss the controversy surrounding misidentified models such as PC-MDS and highlight the importance of rigorous cell line authentication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.