Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41596050›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026

HybridSense-LLM: A Structured Multimodal Framework for Large-Language-Model-Based Wellness Prediction from Wearable Sensors with Contextual Self-Reports.

Cheng-Huan Yu, Mohammad Masum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cheng-Huan YuDepartment of Applied Data Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA.
Mohammad MasumDepartment of Applied Data Science, San Jose State University, San Jose, CA 95192, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9974-6950

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wearable sensors generate continuous physiological and behavioral data at a population scale, yet wellness prediction remains limited by noisy measurements, irregular sampling, and subjective outcomes. We introduce HybridSense, a unified framework that integrates raw wearable signals and their statistical descriptors with large language model-based reasoning to produce accurate and interpretable estimates of stress, fatigue, readiness, and sleep quality. Using the PMData dataset, minute-level heart rate and activity logs are transformed into daily statistical features, whose relevance is ranked using a Random Forest model. These features, together with short waveform segments, are embedded into structured prompts and evaluated across seven prompting strategies using three large language model families: OpenAI 4o-mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash, and DeepSeek Chat. Bootstrap analyses demonstrate robust, task-dependent performance. Zero-shot prompting performs best for fatigue and stress, while few-shot prompting improves sleep-quality estimation. HybridSense further enhances readiness prediction by combining high-level descriptors with waveform context, and self-consistency and tree-of-thought prompting stabilize predictions for highly variable targets. All evaluated models exhibit low inference cost and practical latency. These results suggest that prompt-driven large language model reasoning, when paired with interpretable signal features, offers a scalable and transparent approach to wellness prediction from consumer wearable data.

Indexed as

digital health monitoringhybrid multimodal representationslarge language models (LLMs)physiological signal modelingprompt engineeringwearable sensor analyticswellness prediction

Identifiers

PMID41596050
PMCPMC12837951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.