ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Deep Learning-Based Detection of Carotid Artery Atheromas in Panoramic Radiographs.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiographically visible carotid artery calcifications are typically seen at the level of the C3-C4 cervical vertebrae and can be detected on panoramic dental radiographs. Their early identification is clinically relevant, as they represent a potential marker for increased risk of stroke. In this context, the present study proposes a deep learning method for automatic identification of carotid atheromas using MobileNetV2. From a publicly available dataset, 378 region-of-interest (ROI) images (640 × 320) were prepared and split into train/val/test = 264/57/57 with class counts train 157/107, val 34/23, test 34/23 (negatives/positives). Images underwent standardized preprocessing and on-the-fly augmentation; training used a two-stage scheme (backbone frozen "head" training followed by partial fine-tuning of the top layers), class-weighting, dropout = 0.3, batch normalization (BN) head, early stopping, and partial unfreezing (~70% of the backbone). The decision threshold was selected on validation by Youden's J. On the independent test set, the model achieved an accuracy (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.