ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
A Novel Mixed Stimulation Pattern for Balanced Pulmonary EIT Imaging Performance.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pulmonary electrical impedance tomography (EIT) offers non-invasive and real-time imaging in a compact device size, making it valuable for pulmonary ventilation monitoring. However, conventional EIT stimulation patterns face a trade-off dilemma between anti-noise performance and image interpretability. To address this challenge, we propose a novel mixed stimulation pattern that integrates opposite and adjacent stimulation patterns with a tunable weight ratio. The results of simulations and human experiments (involving 30 subjects) demonstrated that the mixed stimulation pattern uses 200 stimulation-measurement channels, preserves a high signal-to-noise ratio, improves lung separation, and reduces artifacts compared with the opposite and adjacent stimulation patterns. It maintained stable imaging at 600 μA of stimulation current amplitude (equivalent to 1 mA) and preserved most imaging and clinical indicators' stability at 200 μA (except GI/RVD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.