ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Efficient Blended Models for Analysis and Detection of Neuropathic Pain from EEG Signals Using Machine Learning.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Deep-Match Framework for Event-Related Potential Detection in EEG.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Due to the damage happening in the nervous system, neuropathic pain occurs and it affects the quality of life of the patient to a great extent. Therefore, some clinical evaluations are required to assess the diagnostic outcomes precisely. A lot of information about the activities of the brain is provided by Electroencephalography (EEG) signals and neuropathic pain can be assessed and classified with the aid of EEG and machine learning. In this work, two approaches are proposed in terms of efficient blended models for the classification of neuropathic pain through EEG signals. In the first blended model, once the features are extracted using Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT), statistical features, and Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering techniques, the features are selected using Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO), Feature Correlation Clustering Technique (FCCT), F-test, and Bayesian Optimization Algorithm (BOA) and it is classified with the help of three hybrid classification models like Spider Monkey Optimization-based Gradient Boosting Machine (SMO-GBM) classifier, hybrid deep kernel learning with Support Vector Machine (DKL-SVM) classifier, and CatBoost classifier. In the second blended model, once the features are extracted, the features are selected using Hybrid Feature Selection-Majority Voting System (HFS-MVS), Hybrid Salp Swarm Optimization-Particle Swarm Optimization (SSO-PSO), Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC), and Mutual Information (MI) and it is classified with the help of three hybrid classification models like Partial Least Squares (PLS) variant classification models combined with Kernel-based SVM, ensemble classification model with soft voting strategy, and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) classifier. The proposed blended models are evaluated on a publicly available dataset and the best results are shown when the FCM features are selected with SSO-PSO feature selection technique and classified with Polynomial Kernel-based PLS-SVM Classifier, reporting a high classification accuracy of 92.68% in this work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.