Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595953›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Influence of Water Storage on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Aligners: An In Vitro Study.

Kathrin Puchert, Paul Ritzert, Sebastian Wille, Jusef Naim, Sinan Şen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kathrin PuchertDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Paul RitzertDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Sebastian WilleDepartment of Dental Prosthetics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Jusef NaimDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.
Sinan ŞenDepartment of Orthodontics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, 24105 Kiel, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5907-5398

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Directly printed aligners represent a promising alternative to conventional thermoformed aligners. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effects of water on the mechanical properties of directly printed aligners with those of conventionally manufactured thermoformed PET-G foils. Dental LT Clear V2 (LT), V Print Splint Comfort (VP), and TC-85 DAC (TC) were examined. Biolon (BL), a conventional PET-G material, served as the thermoplastic reference material. All samples were tested before and after 14 days of water storage at 37 °C. We performed a three-point bending test and an indentation test, and examined changes in the abrasion resistance and hygroscopic volume. The resistance of all printed specimens decreased significantly after water storage. VP and TC were less resilient than BL overall. LT and BL exhibited the lowest indentation creep (BL: 0.08 ± 0.01, LT: 0.13 ± 0.02, VP: 0.21 ± 0.02, TC: 0.24 ± 0.02). Furthermore, the abrasion of LT (0.72 ± 0.21 mm

Indexed as

direct printed alignermechanical propertieswater storage

Identifiers

PMID41595953
PMCPMC12838107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.