ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Biomechanical Monitoring of Exercise Fatigue Using Wearable Devices: A Review.
Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adaptive ensemble sizing with reinforcement learning for real-time ankle injury detection in wearable sensor systems.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- HURMAT: an alternative approach for fatigue diagnosis and management based on ergonomics and human factors.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Physics-informed hierarchical transformer for wearable sensor-based gait fatigue assessment.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exercise fatigue is a critical factor that compromises athletic performance, increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury, and threatens safety in military and occupational settings. Reliable monitoring of fatigue is therefore essential for optimizing training, preventing injury, and safeguarding long-term health. Biomechanical indicators, including joint kinematics, ground reaction forces, and electromyographic signals, provide valuable insight into the biomechanical manifestations of fatigue. Although traditional laboratory-based methods are accurate, they are costly, cumbersome, and unsuitable for continuous field monitoring. Recent advances in wearable technologies, particularly inertial measurement units (IMUs), insole pressure sensors (IPSs), and surface electromyography (sEMG), enable continuous, noninvasive, and real-time assessment of biomechanical changes during exercise fatigue. This review synthesizes current progress in IMU-, IPS-, and sEMG-based wearable systems for biomechanical exercise fatigue monitoring, highlighting their principles, strengths, and challenges.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.