ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Synergistic Triad of Mixed Reality, 3D Printing, and Navigation in Complex Craniomaxillofacial Reconstruction.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The craniofacial skeleton is a complex three-dimensional structure, and major reconstructive cases remain challenging. We describe a synergistic approach combining intra-operative navigation, three-dimensionally (3D) printed skull models, and mixed reality (MR) to improve predictability in surgical outcomes. A patient with previously repaired bilateral cleft lip and palate, significant midfacial retrusion, and a large maxillary alveolar gap underwent segmental Le Fort I osteotomy and advancement. Preoperative virtual planning was performed, and reference templates were uploaded onto MR glasses. Intra-operatively, the MR glasses projected the templates as holograms onto the patient's skull, guiding osteotomy line marking and validating bony segment movement, which was confirmed with conventional navigation. The 3D-printed skull model facilitated dissection and removal of intervening bony spicules. Preoperative planning proceeded seamlessly across software platforms. Osteotomy lines marked with MR showed good concordance with conventional navigation, and final segment positioning was accurately validated. Postoperative outcomes were satisfactory, with re-established occlusion and closure of the maxillary alveolar gap. The combined use of conventional navigation, 3D-printed models, and MR is feasible and allows safe integration of MR into complex craniofacial reconstruction while further validation of the technology is ongoing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.