Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595938›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2025

PathQC: Determining Molecular and Structural Integrity of Tissues from Histopathological Slides.

Ranjit Kumar Sinha, Anamika Yadav, Sanju Sinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ranjit Kumar SinhaCenter for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA 92037, USA.
Anamika YadavCenter for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA 92037, USA.
Sanju SinhaCenter for Data Science and Artificial Intelligence, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, San Diego, CA 92037, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantifying tissue, molecular, and structural integrity is essential for biobank development. However, current assessment methods either involve destructive testing that depletes valuable biospecimens or rely on manual evaluations, which are not scalable and lead to interindividual variation. To overcome these challenges, we present PathQC, a deep-learning framework that directly predicts the tissue RNA Integrity Number (RIN) and the extent of autolysis from hematoxylin and eosin (H & E)-stained whole-slide images of normal tissue biopsies. Advancing over prior QC methods focused on imaging quality control, PathQC provides sample-quality control through the direct quantification of molecular integrity (RIN) and structural degradation (autolysis). PathQC first extracts morphological features from the slide using a recently developed digital pathology foundation model (UNI), followed by a supervised model that learns to predict RNA Integrity Number and autolysis scores from these morphological features. PathQC is trained on and applied to the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) cohort, which comprises 25,306 non-diseased post-mortem samples across 29 tissues from 970 donors, when paired ground-truth RIN and autolysis scores were available. Here, PathQC predicted RIN with an average Pearson correlation of 0.47 and an autolysis score of 0.45, with notably high performance using adrenal gland tissue (R = 0.82) for RIN and colon tissue (R = 0.83) for autolysis. We provide a pan-tissue model for predicting RIN and autolysis scores for new slides from any tissue type (GitHub). Overall, PathQC enables a scalable assessment of tissue molecular and structural integrity from routine H & E images, enhancing biobank quality control and retrospective analyses across 29 tissues and multiple collection sites.

Indexed as

biobanking applicationdigital pathologyquality control

Identifiers

PMID41595938
PMCPMC12838397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.