ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Developing and Validating a Global Governance Framework for Health: A Delphi Consensus Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic exposed major deficiencies in global health governance, including fragmented authority, inequitable resource distribution, and weak compliance mechanisms. Although the WHO Pandemic Agreement (2025) addresses several of these gaps, significant operational and institutional challenges remain. This study aims to develop and empirically validate a Global Governance for Health (GGFH) Framework that strengthens leadership, financing, equity, and legal accountability across global, regional, and national levels.
methodsA three-round Delphi study was conducted. Thirty-one experts from diverse sectors, including public health, international law, economics, environment, and diplomacy, evaluated 32 structured governance statements across seven domains. Experts rated all statements using a 7-point Likert scale. Consensus was determined using a strict threshold median ≥ 6; SD ≤ 1.35; ≥75% agreement. Open-text comments were systematically reviewed through thematic analysis. All statements were systematically mapped to the WHO Pandemic Agreement articles to identify areas lacking operational clarity or enforceability.
resultsAll seven governance domains achieved consensus by Round 3. High agreement emerged on strengthening WHO leadership, implementing sustainable and equitable financing mechanisms, embedding LMIC representation, establishing legal preparedness and capacity-building, and integrating independent accountability tools. Correlation and interdependence analyses demonstrated that governance goals form an integrated, mutually reinforcing system, with financing, equity, and legal frameworks identified as core enablers of effective treaty implementation.
conclusionsThe Delphi process validated a comprehensive and operational Global Governance for Health Framework. The GGFH complements the WHO Pandemic Agreement by addressing its unresolved governance, financing, and equity limitations and offers a structured roadmap to guide global pandemic preparedness and treaty implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.