Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595918›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Exploring Inclusion in Austria's Breast Cancer Screening:A Dual-Perspective Study of Women with Intellectual Disabilities and Their Caregivers.

Theresa Wagner, Nourhan Makled, Katrina Scior, Laura Maria König, Matthias Unseld, Elisabeth Lucia Zeilinger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Theresa WagnerDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0009-0002-5118-2548
Nourhan MakledDivision of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Katrina SciorResearch Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, UCL Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, London WC1E 7HB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4679-0090
Laura Maria KönigDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3655-8842
Matthias UnseldDepartment of Clinical Research SBG, Academy for Ageing Research, Haus der Barmherzigkeit, 1160 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-9846
Elisabeth Lucia ZeilingerDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Vienna, 1010 Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-0625-500X

Funding

City of Vienna Fund for Innovative Interdisciplinary Cancer Research 22230
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with intellectual disabilities (IDs) face persistent health inequities, particularly in preventive services such as breast cancer screening, where participation rates remain disproportionately low. These disparities contribute to higher mortality and poorer survivorship outcomes, often linked to later-stage diagnoses. To better understand these challenges and inform the development of inclusive screening programs, this qualitative study conducted in Austria explored barriers, facilitators, and needs related to breast cancer screening from the dual perspectives of 17 women with mild-to-moderate IDs aged 45 and older and 10 caregivers. Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were analyzed thematically within a constructivist framework, integrating perspectives from both groups. Barriers included social taboos around sexuality, psychological distress, exclusion through standardized procedures, and unclear responsibility among stakeholders. Facilitators involved person-centered communication, accessible information, emotional and practical support, and familiar healthcare environments. Women with IDs expressed a strong desire for education, autonomy, and inclusion, while caregivers played a pivotal role in enabling access. These findings demonstrate that low screening participation among women with IDs is driven by systemic and organizational barriers rather than lack of health awareness or willingness to participate. Without structurally inclusive design, organized screening programs risk perpetuating preventable inequities in early detection. Embedding accessibility, clear accountability, and person-centered communication as standard features of breast cancer screening is therefore a public health priority to reduce avoidable late-stage diagnoses and narrow survival disparities for women with IDs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCaregiversEarly Detection of CancerIntellectual DisabilityAgedAustriaFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMiddle AgedQualitative Researchbreast health awarenesscancer disparitieshealth care accessibilityhealth equityhealth servicesintellectual disabilitieslearning disabilitiesperson-centered carepreventive carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID41595918
PMCPMC12840729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.