ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Upper Crossed Syndrome in the Workplace: A Narrative Review with Clinical Recommendations for Non-Pharmacologic Management.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
problem statementUpper crossed syndrome (UCS), as first described by Janda, refers to a group of muscle imbalances in which tightness in the upper trapezius and levator scapulae dorsally cross with tightness in the pectoralis major and minor muscles, and weakness of deep cervical flexors cross ventrally with weakness of the middle and lower trapezius. Postural alterations from this dysfunction, including forward head, rounded shoulders, and scapular dyskinesis, contribute to upper-back and shoulder pain, particularly among office workers who spend long periods of the workday on a computer. Upper crossed syndrome is a significant contributor to both neck pain and shoulder pain among computer users, which have been rated at 55-69%, and 15-52%, respectively. Despite its prevalence, knowledge about UCS and its treatment remains spotty among primary care physicians. In addition, improvements in workstation ergonomics along with hourly work breaks may be considered as primary prevention strategies for UCS.
objectivesThis narrative review examines and synthesizes evidence about the epidemiology and diagnosis of UCS, along with clinical recommendations for physiotherapeutic approaches to treatment. Ergonomic measures in the workplace, including changes in the design of computer workstations so that both the keyboard and monitor are at the proper heights to minimize the risk of long-term musculoskeletal disorders, are also critical.
methodsThe first author, a Doctor of Behavioral Health, performed the initial literature search, which was reviewed by the second author, a PhD in sports injury epidemiology. The third author, a chiropractor and practice owner, provided clinical recommendations for stretching and strengthening exercises, which were also described in the literature. DISCUSSION: While easily treatable when caught early, UCS may become resistant to noninvasive approaches over time, and more severe pathologies of the neck and shoulder, including impingement, thoracic outlet syndrome, and cervicogenic headaches may result. Because there is no specific ICD code for UCS, it is important for physicians to recognize the early signs, consider them in the context of workplace-related injuries, and understand physiotherapeutic strategies for symptom resolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.