Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595878›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

A Systematic Review of Ecological Momentary Assessment Procedures of Self-Harm (With and Without Suicidal Intent) Studies in Adolescents and Young Adults.

Bethany Martin, Susan Rasmussen, Kirsten Russell, Megan Crawford, Spence Whittaker, Scott Thomson, Abbie Greenwood

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bethany MartinDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0506-0208
Susan RasmussenDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6408-0028
Kirsten RussellDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Megan CrawfordDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Spence WhittakerDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Scott ThomsonDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.
Abbie GreenwoodDepartment of Psychological Sciences and Health, University of Strathclyde, 40 George Street, Glasgow G1 1QE, UK.ORCID 0009-0006-4625-5430

Funding

University of Strathclyde N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) captures real-time data on thoughts, emotions, and behaviours within individuals' natural environments. Although EMA has been increasingly used to examine self-harm, existing reviews have not focused specifically on adolescents. This systematic review examines EMA research on adolescent self-harm, focusing on methodological considerations and key risk and protective factors for self-harm. Five databases, plus pre-print, unpublished and grey literature sources, were searched up to 30 January 2024. Studies were included if published in English, used EMA methodology, included adolescents aged 10-24 years and measured suicidal ideation, suicidal behaviours, or self-harm. The review included 79 studies, published from 2009 to the present. Self-harm was associated with numerous risk factors, including negative affect, stress, interpersonal influences and sleep. EMA was generally well-accepted by adolescent participants, with high compliance rates. The findings highlight the value of EMA in capturing real-time fluctuations in self-harm and associated risk factors among adolescents. EMA demonstrates strong potential for improving understanding and prediction of self-harm; yet challenges remain, including variability in study designs and a lack of clear reporting of the methodologies. Future research should focus on standardising methodologies, increasing participant diversity, and exploring the clinical utility of EMA in early intervention and prevention strategies.

Indexed as

Ecological Momentary AssessmentSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicidal IdeationAdolescentChildHumansRisk FactorsYoung Adultadolescenceambulatory assessmentecological momentary assessmentexperience samplingnon-suicidal self-injuryself-harmsuicidesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41595878
PMCPMC12841142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.