Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595812›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Women's Experiences in the Process of Illness and Care During Tuberculosis Treatment: Systematic Review of a Qualitative Evidence.

Ana Luíza Brasileiro Nato Marques Assumpção, Flávia Correia Silva, Licia Kellen de Almeida Andrade, Quézia Rosa Ferreira, Gilberto da Cruz Leal, Mônica Cristina Ribeiro Alexandre d'Auria de Lima, Isabela Zaccaro Rigolin, Júlia Jéssica de Moraes, José Nildo de Barros Silva Junior, Rubia Laine de Paula Andrade-Gonçalves and 3 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ana Luíza Brasileiro Nato Marques AssumpçãoRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-0859-3117
Flávia Correia SilvaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Licia Kellen de Almeida AndradeRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4115-3022
Quézia Rosa FerreiraRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Gilberto da Cruz LealRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-6959
Mônica Cristina Ribeiro Alexandre d'Auria de LimaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Isabela Zaccaro RigolinRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Júlia Jéssica de MoraesRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
José Nildo de Barros Silva JuniorRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Rubia Laine de Paula Andrade-GonçalvesRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5843-1733
Mônica Maria de Jesus SilvaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4532-3992
Pedro Fredemir PalhaRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.
Jaqueline Garcia de Almeida BallesteroRibeirão Preto College of Nursing, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto 14040-902, SP, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6585-2560

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior-Brazil (CAPES)-Finance Code 001 0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify scientific evidence that addresses women's experiences in the process of illness and care during tuberculosis treatment. A systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted based on the Joanna Briggs Institute's Manual for Evidence Synthesis and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Searches were performed in the Web of Science, MEDLINE, Embase, SciVerse Scopus, and LILACS databases. The following descriptors were used: "Women," "Tuberculosis," "Gender Perspective," and "Qualitative Approach." Studies reporting the experiences of women with active tuberculosis, published in any language, without time restrictions, were included. Of the 16,029 studies initially identified, 7079 duplicates were removed and 8895 were excluded after title and abstract screening. A total of 55 studies were read in full, of which 41 did not meet the eligibility criteria, resulting in a final inclusion of 14 studies. Most selected studies were conducted in high-tuberculosis-burden, low- and middle-income countries between 2000 and 2024. All studies focused on pulmonary tuberculosis, with one addressing drug-resistant tuberculosis. The results revealed that women's experiences with tuberculosis are shaped by the following four thematic categories: (1) stigma and social vulnerability of women with tuberculosis; (2) gender factors in access to health services and in the interruption of tuberculosis treatment among women; (3) intersectionality and social determinants of health; and (4) the importance of social, family, and healthcare support in the experience of tuberculosis illness. The experience of illness due to tuberculosis among women is profoundly shaped by vulnerabilities related to gender, stigma, and social class, which intensify social exclusion, hinder access to diagnosis and treatment, and deepen physical and emotional suffering. Stigma reinforces isolation and weakens support networks, while the burden of domestic labor, caregiving responsibilities, and economic dependence makes it difficult for women to prioritize their own health. In this context, family support and gender-sensitive, humanized healthcare are essential. Therefore, the implementation of public policies that address these specificities and confront structural inequalities is urgent to ensure comprehensive care and a dignified, effective recovery for women with tuberculosis.

Indexed as

TuberculosisFemaleHumansQualitative Researchgender perspectivequalitative approachsystematic reviewtuberculosiswomen

Identifiers

PMID41595812
PMCPMC12841118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.