ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025
Adverse Materno-Foetal Outcomes of Pre-Eclampsia at a Rural Tertiary Hospital in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pre-eclampsia affects several physiological systems, often changing the course of pregnancy and manifesting with both maternal and foetal adversities, with a higher burden in rural Sub-Saharan African settings. This study presents maternal and foetal adverse outcomes associated with pre-eclampsia at a rural tertiary hospital in the Eastern Cape Province of South Africa. A prospective analytical case-control study was conducted with 250 pregnant women planned for delivery at the study setting's labour unit. Pregnant women with pre-eclampsia were considered cases, whereas pregnant women without pre-eclampsia were considered controls. Cases were enrolled first, followed by a matched pair of controls based on their gravidity. A consecutive sampling technique was used to recruit eligible cases and controls. Data was collected using a self-designed questionnaire followed by descriptive and inferential analysis. Adverse foetal outcomes associated with pre-eclampsia were low birth weight [Adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 2.1,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.