Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595805›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2025

Physical Activity, Cognitive Health and Learning in Youth: A Narrative Umbrella Review.

Sven Unterguggenberger

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sven UnterguggenbergerDepartment of Human Movement Sciences, Sport and Health, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria.ORCID 0009-0000-1801-3350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although physical activity has been widely investigated for potential cognitive and academic benefits in children and adolescents, the evidence base remains mixed and characterized by substantial methodological variability. The present narrative umbrella review synthesizes and critically evaluates recent meta-analyses to identify patterns, strengths, and limitations in the existing literature. A comprehensive search identified systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in recent years that examined the effects of physical activity, exercise, and sports interventions on cognitive outcomes in healthy participants aged 5 to 17 years. In total, seven meta-analyses, covering 181 primary studies with approximately 42,000 participants, met the inclusion criteria. Across reviews, small positive effects of physical activity were reported for executive functions and attention, whereas findings for academic performance were inconsistent. Substantial variation in intervention duration, exercise modality, intensity, implementation context, and cognitive assessment procedures limited comparability and constrained interpretability. Overall, the synthesis indicates modest cognitive benefits of physical activity in youth, while underscoring the need for clearer operationalization of cognitive constructs, standardized intervention protocols, and transparent methodological reporting. From an applied perspective, integrating feasible, developmentally appropriate, and cognitively engaging physical activity into school and community settings may help support attention, executive functions, and broader cognitive health in young populations.

Indexed as

CognitionExerciseLearningAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolExecutive FunctionHumansacademic performanceattentionchildren and adolescentsexecutive functionsphysical activityschool-based interventions

Identifiers

PMID41595805
PMCPMC12841123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.