ReviewGenes2026
Advances in Nondestructive DNA Extraction from Teeth for Human Identification.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review synthesizes advances in nondestructive DNA extraction from teeth, emphasizing their importance in forensics and archaeogenetics. Because of their mineralized structure and resistance to diagenesis, teeth remain vital for human identification when other tissues are unavailable or degraded. Modern protocols targeting dental cementum have shown high success rates in retrieving nuclear DNA while maintaining specimen integrity, supporting ethical standards, and enabling additional morphological and isotopic analyses. Nondestructive extraction methods produce DNA yields comparable to-or in some archaeological cases, greater than-those of traditional destructive approaches, while ensuring strict contamination control and minimal physical impact. Cementum is a reliable source of DNA in aged and degraded teeth, although the petrous part of the temporal bone still represents the best option under extreme preservation conditions. These results highlight the need for context-specific sampling strategies that balance analytical goals with the preservation of museum collections. Future efforts include testing nondestructive protocols across various forensic scenarios and creating predictive models for DNA preservation. Overall, these developments promote ethical, effective, and sustainable practices in human genomic analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.