ReviewGenes2026
The Genetic and Epigenetic Architecture of Keratoconus: Emerging Pathways and Clinical Implications.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKeratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal ectasia and a leading cause of corneal transplantation in young adults. Once regarded as a biomechanical disorder, KC is now recognized as a complex disease driven by genetic predisposition, epigenetic modulation, and environmental triggers. Advances in genomics and transcriptomics have begun to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying corneal thinning and ectasia.
objectivesThis review synthesizes two decades of evidence on the genetic and epigenetic architecture of keratoconus, highlights key molecular pathways implicated by these findings, and discusses translational implications for early diagnosis, risk prediction, and novel therapeutic strategies.
methodsA narrative review was conducted of peer-reviewed human, animal, and in vitro studies published from 2000 to 2025, with emphasis on genome-wide association studies (GWAS), sequencing data, methylation profiling, and non-coding RNA analyses. Findings were integrated with functional studies linking genetic variation to molecular and biomechanical phenotypes.
resultsGenetic studies consistently implicate loci such as
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.