Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595478›Full record

ReviewGenes2026

Expanded Carrier Screening: Current Evidence and Future Directions in the Era of Population Genomics.

Lucrezia Pilenzi, Vincenzo Scorrano, Sara Di Rado, Carlotta Buccolini, Roberta Giansante, Laura Siciliani, Liborio Stuppia, Valentina Gatta, Antonio Capalbo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lucrezia PilenziDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Vincenzo ScorranoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Sara Di RadoDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Carlotta BuccoliniDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Roberta GiansanteDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Laura SicilianiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-0292-2684
Liborio StuppiaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Valentina GattaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9999-5823
Antonio CapalboDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Expanded carrier screening (ECS) has emerged as a cornerstone of reproductive genetics, enabling the identification of couples at risk of transmitting autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. Advances in next-generation sequencing and the increasing adoption of exome- and genome-based strategies have greatly expanded its clinical scope. However, despite existing national and international recommendations, substantial heterogeneity remains in gene panel composition, inclusion criteria, and interpretation frameworks. A key novelty of the current genomic era is the availability of large, publicly accessible human genome datasets encompassing broader ancestral diversity. These resources are transforming our understanding of variant frequencies and disease penetrance across populations, supporting the development of evidence-based and ancestry-informed gene panels. In parallel, recent studies investigating the genetic contribution of pathogenic variants to euploid pregnancy losses are opening new perspectives for ECS. Incorporating genes associated with lethal conditions in utero may enhance the predictive power of screening and deepen our understanding of reproductive outcomes, while also demanding careful consideration of clinical validity and counseling implications. This mini-review synthesizes current evidence on ECS, examines ongoing interpretive and implementation challenges, and discusses how population-scale genomic resources and emerging data on reproductive lethality are shaping the next generation of evidence-based carrier screening.

Indexed as

Genetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingGenomicsFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetics, PopulationGenome, HumanHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPregnancyartificial intelligenceexpanded carrier screeninggenetic counselingreproductive geneticsvariants of uncertain significance

Identifiers

PMID41595478
PMCPMC12841374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.