ReviewGenes2026
Expanded Carrier Screening: Current Evidence and Future Directions in the Era of Population Genomics.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Insights into the Complexities of Pharmacotherapy Parameters in Artificial Intelligence Models for Drug Selection, Precision Personalised Medicine and Optimal Therapeutic Outcomes.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Advanced maternal age and assisted reproductive technologies: outcomes, genomics, and real-world evidence.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Expanded carrier screening (ECS) has emerged as a cornerstone of reproductive genetics, enabling the identification of couples at risk of transmitting autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. Advances in next-generation sequencing and the increasing adoption of exome- and genome-based strategies have greatly expanded its clinical scope. However, despite existing national and international recommendations, substantial heterogeneity remains in gene panel composition, inclusion criteria, and interpretation frameworks. A key novelty of the current genomic era is the availability of large, publicly accessible human genome datasets encompassing broader ancestral diversity. These resources are transforming our understanding of variant frequencies and disease penetrance across populations, supporting the development of evidence-based and ancestry-informed gene panels. In parallel, recent studies investigating the genetic contribution of pathogenic variants to euploid pregnancy losses are opening new perspectives for ECS. Incorporating genes associated with lethal conditions in utero may enhance the predictive power of screening and deepen our understanding of reproductive outcomes, while also demanding careful consideration of clinical validity and counseling implications. This mini-review synthesizes current evidence on ECS, examines ongoing interpretive and implementation challenges, and discusses how population-scale genomic resources and emerging data on reproductive lethality are shaping the next generation of evidence-based carrier screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.