ReviewCancers2026
Clinical Trials Update in Resectable Esophageal Cancer.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Associations of PD-L1 expression status, tumor histology and patient ethnic background with immunotherapy outcomes in patients with advanced esophageal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Response-adapted perioperative therapy for resectable esophageal cancer in the immunotherapy era: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of resectable esophageal cancer has evolved into a multidisciplinary paradigm centered on multimodality therapy. Historically, induction chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery, as established by the CROSS trial, became the standard of care for locally advanced disease due to improvements in R0 resection rates and overall survival. More recently, the ESOPEC trial reexamined this paradigm in esophageal adenocarcinoma, demonstrating superior survival and improved systemic disease control with perioperative chemotherapy using the FLOT regimen compared with chemoradiotherapy. In parallel, the MATTERHORN trial further advanced perioperative treatment by showing improved event-free survival with the addition of the immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab to FLOT chemotherapy. Alongside these systemic therapy advances, surgical management has transitioned toward minimally invasive and robotic-assisted esophagectomy, offering equivalent oncologic outcomes with reduced perioperative morbidity. This review summarizes the evolving evidence from pivotal clinical trials, highlights ongoing studies integrating immunotherapy, and discusses emerging strategies such as adoptive cell transfer which currently is under investigation for metastatic recurrence, but in the future may provide additional treatment options for resectable esophageal cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.