Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595106›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Strategies in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, Normothermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy, and Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy.

Nency Ganatra, Ahmed Abdelhakeem, Pragya Jain, Saivaishnavi Kamatham, Dina Elantably, Oluwatayo Adeoye, Hani M Babiker, Conor D O'Donnell, Umair Majeed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) for peritoneal metastases: a scoping review of clinical evidence across emerging indications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nency GanatraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, TX 77701, USA.
Ahmed AbdelhakeemDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Pragya JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Beaumont, TX 77701, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-3115-5286
Saivaishnavi KamathamDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Dina ElantablyDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Oluwatayo AdeoyeDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Hani M BabikerDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
Conor D O'DonnellDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6291-846X
Umair MajeedDivision of Haematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeritoneal metastasis represents an aggressive disease pattern in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), traditionally associated with poor survival and limited therapeutic options. Emerging intraperitoneal chemotherapy strategies-including hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), normothermic intraperitoneal paclitaxel (NIPEC/IP-PTX), and pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC)-have been investigated to improve local tumor control and survival outcomes.

methodsWe systematically reviewed published studies evaluating HIPEC, NIPEC/IP-PTX, and PIPAC in PDAC, including adjuvant, cytoreductive, and palliative settings. Study characteristics, feasibility, perioperative outcomes, oncologic outcomes, and risk of bias were analyzed.

resultsAcross modalities, intraperitoneal treatment strategies demonstrated acceptable feasibility and safety profiles in appropriately selected patients. Adjuvant HIPEC following pancreatectomy showed reduced local-regional recurrence signals in limited cohorts. CRS + HIPEC among patients with isolated peritoneal metastases yielded encouraging multi-year survival in highly selected candidates achieving complete cytoreduction. NIPEC/IP-PTX demonstrated favorable ascites control, symptom relief, and potential conversion to resection in select patients. PIPAC was primarily used in unresectable, heavily pretreated, palliative peritoneal metastasis settings, with goals centered on disease stabilization, histologic regression, and symptom control rather than curative intent.

conclusionsIntraperitoneal chemotherapy strategies in PDAC appear feasible with signals of meaningful clinical benefit in select settings. While CRS + HIPEC may benefit carefully selected metastatic patients, NIPEC/IP-PTX and PIPAC hold value primarily in symptom control and disease stabilization. Larger prospective trials are needed to define patient selection, optimize treatment protocols, and clarify survival benefit.

Indexed as

HIPECNIPEC paclitaxelpancreatic cancerPIPAC

Identifiers

PMID41595106
PMCPMC12838573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.