ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigating the Impact of AI-Supported Self-Coaching as a Professional Development Model for Embedded Instruction in Inclusive Early Childhood Settings.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the effectiveness of an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-supported self-coaching system designed to improve preschool teachers' implementation of embedded instruction (EI) for young children with autism in inclusive early childhood classrooms. Using a multiple-probe across participants single-case design with four teacher-child dyads, the study evaluated changes in teacher fidelity, child learning outcomes, maintenance, generalization, and teacher perceptions. Following baseline and an initial EI training, teachers engaged in weekly AI-supported self-coaching cycles that included planning, data entry, reflection, and AI-generated individualized feedback. Results demonstrated clear functional relations between the introduction of the AI-supported system and increases in teachers' EI fidelity. All teachers reached high levels of accurate implementation, maintained their performance after AI supports were withdrawn, and generalized EI procedures to non-targeted routines. Correspondingly, children showed substantial improvements in unprompted correct responding on individualized goals, with gains sustained across maintenance and generalization probes. Social validity data indicated that teachers found both EI and AI-supported self-coaching highly acceptable, feasible, and helpful for guiding instructional decision-making. Findings provide promising initial evidence that AI-supported self-coaching can serve as a scalable, cost-effective professional development approach that strengthens teacher practice and enhances learning outcomes for young children with autism in inclusive preschool settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.