ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Emotionally Structured Interaction Networks and Consumer Perception of New Energy Vehicle Technology: A Behavioral Network Analysis of Online Brand Communities.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Unpacking Brand Fandom: Triadic Brand-Related Perceptions and Fan Behaviors.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates how emotionally structured online interaction networks shape consumer perception of new energy vehicle (NEV) technology. Drawing on discussion forum data from two leading NEV brands, Brand_T and Brand_B, we focus on how users respond to brand technological narratives and how these responses translate into distinct patterns of peer-to-peer interaction. Using a behavioral network analysis framework, we integrate sentiment analysis, topic modeling, and Exponential Random Graph Modeling (ERGM) to uncover the psychological and structural mechanisms underlying consumer engagement. Three main findings emerge. First, users display brand-specific emotional-cognitive profiles: Brand_T communities show broader technological engagement but more heterogeneous emotional responses, whereas Brand_B communities exhibit more emotionally aligned discussions. Second, emotional homophily is a robust driver of interaction ties, particularly in Brand_B forums, where positive sentiment clusters into dense and supportive discussion subnetworks. Third, perceived technological benefits, rather than risk sensitivity, are consistently associated with higher interaction intensity, underscoring the motivational salience of anticipated gains over cautionary concerns in shaping engagement behavior. The study contributes to behavioral science and transportation behavior research by linking consumer sentiment, cognition, and social interaction dynamics in digital environments, offering an integrated theoretical account that bridges the Elaboration Likelihood Model, social identity processes, and behavioral network formation. This advances the understanding of technology perception from static individual evaluations to dynamic, group-structured outcomes. It highlights how emotionally patterned interaction networks can reinforce or recalibrate technology-related perceptions, offering practical implications for NEV manufacturers and policymakers seeking to design psychologically informed communication strategies that support sustainable technology adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.