Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595043›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Effect of Coherence on Instruction Following from News Outlets.

Michael O'Sullivan, Conor McCloskey, Louise McHugh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael O'SullivanSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.
Conor McCloskeySchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-1807-9947
Louise McHughSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2526-4649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research has shown that preferences exist in following information from coherent sources and that incoherent material can diminish overall trust in sources from readers. In line with relational frame theory, coherence, or "sense-making", has emerged as an important factor in the process of rule-following, but some research has been confounded by the degree of extremity used to establish coherence. The present study investigated the role of speaker coherence in rule-following preferences between newspaper outlets. Participants (N = 64) each viewed four news articles that had been published across two anonymized Irish newspaper outlets. Each article was categorized by its level of coherence and level of controversy. Rule-following was measured through the likelihood of participants adopting new habits and following general advice from the news outlet after reading each story. Participants also selected their preferred outlet from which to follow general advice at the end of the study. Results indicated that participants had greater rule-following preferences for coherent outlets, regardless of how controversial the material was perceived to be. Speaker coherence was discussed in terms of its impact on the perceived credibility of media outlets and avenues for reducing polarization.

Indexed as

coherencenews mediarelational frame theoryrule-followingrule-governed behavior

Identifiers

PMID41595043
PMCPMC12837148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.