Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595037›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

The Effects of Trait Anxiety and Emotional Word Type on the Processing of Chinese Words: An ERP Study.

Jia Liu, Lin Fan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jia LiuSchool of Foreign Studies, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7851-1850
Lin FanNational Research Center for Foreign Language Education, Beijing Foreign Studies University, Beijing 100089, China.

Funding

Chinese National Social Science Foundation 23CYY043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissociation between emotion-label and emotion-laden words has been investigated in both behavioral and electrophysiological studies. However, how individual differences modulates the processing of emotional words has not been fully explored. Trait anxiety, as an important individual difference variable, plays a vital role in emotion processing, and may influence the processing of emotional words. To reveal the effects of trait anxiety and emotional word type on the processing of Chinese words, the present study adopted a lexical decision task (LDT) and event-related potential (ERP) technique to collect the behavioral and electrophysiological data from high-trait-anxious (HTA), medium-trait-anxious (MTA) and low-trait-anxious (LTA) individuals. Behaviorally, participants demonstrated longer reaction times (RTs) and lower accuracy (ACC) when processing emotion-laden words, as opposed to emotion-label words and neutral words. Electrophysiologically, both emotion-label and emotion-laden words induced enhanced N170 amplitudes relative to neutral ones. Compared with neutral words, emotion-laden words elicited larger early posterior negativity (EPN) amplitudes in the right hemisphere and increased late positive component (LPC) amplitudes, whereas emotion-label words elicited a stronger N400. EPN amplitudes were modulated by the interaction between trait anxiety and emotional word type. In HTA individuals, emotion-laden words evoked a larger EPN than emotion-label and neutral words, supporting the mediated emotion concept account, density hypothesis, and embodiment emotion account. During the late elaborative processing stage, LTA participants exhibited larger LPC amplitudes than HTA individuals, which aligns with the "vigilance-avoidance" pattern.

Indexed as

emotion-label wordsemotion-laden wordsERPtrait anxiety

Identifiers

PMID41595037
PMCPMC12837275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.