ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Review of UK and Ireland Surveys of Health Professional Educators on Teaching of Sexual- and Gender-Minority Health.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual and gender minority (SGM) people report considerable dissatisfaction with health services compared to heterosexual and/or cisgender people, with health professionals highlighting insufficient training. Teaching about the health of SGM people is not mandated in UK health professionals' educational curricula. A review of published and unpublished surveys and of UK training courses evaluating LGBTQ+ content, in the UK and Ireland, examining the teaching of the health of SGM people to health professionals was conducted. Fifteen surveys from the perspectives of educators and students were compared and contrasted. Surveys were found from educators from undergraduate medicine, nursing and midwifery, and pharmacy schools, from students at dental, medical, and pharmacy schools, and from qualified doctors and paramedics. Students and clinical staff perceived that they have insufficient training in SGM health, although there is a contradiction in the perception of teaching amount between students and educational staff. Two curriculum reviews of Royal College postgraduate medical training showed either no or very few requirements on SGM health. Although some courses make considerable efforts to fully incorporate SGM health into mandatory curricula appropriately, professionals mention insufficient training. Until curriculum setters mandate SGM health, patient complaints will continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.