Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41595004›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

"It Is Not Possible to Balance It Easily": A Phenomenological Study Exploring the Experience of Work-Family Conflict in Contemporary Chinese Society.

Shujie Chen, Mei-I Cheng, Shira Elqayam, Mark Scase

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shujie ChenDepartment of Business Administration, School of Business, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0701-6737
Mei-I ChengSchool of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-5739
Shira ElqayamSchool of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4813-8597
Mark ScaseSchool of Applied Social Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3929-294X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This qualitative study aimed to explore the work-family conflict phenomenon in China, to extend our understanding of such a phenomenon experienced under a different cultural background outside of the West, and to help suggest the Chinese culturally specific variables (e.g., filial piety) related to the work-family conflict in China for future research. A purposive sample of 16 Chinese employees was interviewed. Using Creswell's phenomenological method, six themes and 17 sub-themes emerged through 297 significant statements. The participants described the work-family conflict as only a life experience or no more than a minor problem in life that has influenced their coping strategy (e.g., avoidance coping). It appeared that Chinese culture places both positive and negative effects that simultaneously ease and exacerbate work-family conflict (e.g., a greater level of family support came with more family obligation). After comparing the results with the previous Western findings, differences in the experience of work-family conflict were identified. Relevant factors related to the experience of work-family conflict were suggested, providing directions for future work-family conflict studies.

Indexed as

cultural differencesphenomenological methodwork–family conflict

Identifiers

PMID41595004
PMCPMC12837297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.