Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594987›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Development and Validation of Human-Computer Collaborative Classroom Second Language Learning Engagement Scale.

Yanshuang Jiang, Yuxuan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanshuang JiangChina Institute of Education and Social Development, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0004-7108-7139
Yuxuan LiuFaculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.ORCID 0009-0008-6170-7479

Funding

National Social Science Foundation Youth Program in Pedagogy No. CCA240259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study developed and validated the Human-Computer Collaborative Classroom Second Language Learning Engagement Scale among 710 junior high school students studying in Mongolian. Initially, the scale's conceptual framework was developed through a review of pertinent literature and interview, drawing on self-determination theory and socio-constructivist perspectives to define engagement in human-computer collaborative second language learning contexts. The study adopted a sequential mixed-methods design: in Phase 1, item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) were conducted using data from 437 students, resulting in a preliminary five-factor structure; in Phase 2, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using data from the remaining 273 students to validate the factor structure. The final scale comprises five core dimensions: (1) higher-order thinking, (2) student-teacher interaction, (3) human-computer interaction, (4) active collaborative learning, and (5) learning enthusiasm. Structural equation modeling confirmed a robust five-factor model, with all fit indices indicating satisfactory model fit (e.g., CFI = 0.981, TLI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.041). The scale demonstrates strong internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.959) and construct validity. These findings highlight the reliability and efficacy of this psychometric tool for evaluating students' engagement in second language learning within human-computer collaborative classroom environments, offering valuable insights for educators and researchers.

Indexed as

ethnic minority students in junior high schoolshuman–computer collaborative classroomscale developmentsecond language learningstudent engagement

Identifiers

PMID41594987
PMCPMC12837321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.