ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Encoding Effort Eliminates the Animacy Advantage in Memory When Manipulated with Value-Directed Remembering.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
People are more likely to remember words that refer to living/animate things than nonliving/inanimate things across various memory tasks, yielding an animacy advantage in recall. We tested an encoding-effort explanation for this effect: that people naturally devote more attention or encoding effort to living things over nonliving things during encoding, producing the effect. We used both between-participants (Experiment 1) and within-participants (Experiment 2) manipulations of value (i.e., participants earned a different number of points for each word they recalled) to affect encoding effort at the task and item level, respectively. We predicted that leading participants to devote more encoding effort to the items (in particular, the inanimate words) would reduce or even eliminate the animacy advantage, as has been found in some prior studies that used mental-imagery manipulations. Overall, participants recalled more animate words than inanimate words and recalled more words under higher-effort than under lower-effort conditions. In line with our predictions, these two factors interacted: the animacy effect was eliminated under higher-effort conditions, as these conditions led to an increase in the recall of inanimate words compared to animate words. The results therefore support an encoding-effort explanation for the animacy advantage in free-recall performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.