ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Body Knowledge and Emotion Recognition in Preschool Children: A Comparative Study of Human Versus Robot Tutors.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Social robots are increasingly integrated into early childhood education, yet limited research exists examining preschoolers' learning from robotic versus human demonstrators across embodied tasks. This study investigated whether children (aged between 3 and 6) demonstrate comparable performance when learning body-centered tasks from a humanoid robot compared to a human demonstrator. Sixty-two typically developing children were randomly assigned to a robot or a human condition. Participants completed three tasks: body part comprehension and production, body movement imitation, and emotion recognition from body postures. Performance was measured using standardized protocols. No significant main effects of demonstrator type emerged across most tasks. However, age significantly predicted performance across all measures, with systematic improvements between 3 and 6. A significant age × demonstrator interaction was observed for sequential motor imitation, with stronger age effects for the human demonstrator condition. Preschool children demonstrate comparable performance when interacting with a humanoid robot versus a human in body-centered tasks, though motor imitation shows differential developmental trajectories. These findings suggest appropriately designed social robots may serve as supplementary pedagogical tools for embodied learning in early childhood education under specific conditions. The primacy of developmental effects highlights the importance of age-appropriate design in both traditional and technology-enhanced educational contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.