ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
The Influence of Social Word Features on Early Word Learning in Autistic and Non-Autistic Children.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early word learning is a critical milestone for children, yet autistic children often experience delays in language development. Social communication differences are a core feature of autism and may contribute to variability in learning experiences. Prior research has shown that word-level features such as iconicity, concreteness, and input frequency shape the timing of word learning, but less is known about the role of social word features. This study examined whether social word ratings predict when words tend to be acquired by autistic and non-autistic children. Social word ratings were examined as a predictor of word-level autistic and non-autistic acquisition normative data, while accounting for word input frequency. Regression analyses demonstrated that social ratings significantly predicted vocabulary acquisition, even after controlling for word frequency. Additional analyses demonstrated that socialness ratings continued to be a unique predictor of word acquisition when other affective features of words were included in the model (i.e., arousal and valence); this was also the case when iconicity and concreteness were included. Importantly, differences in group and interactions with social ratings and group were not statistically significant in any of the models. Lastly, the pattern of highly social words being acquired later in vocabulary development was strongest for nouns; the association was non-significant when examining verbs separately. Thus, in addition to previously studied word features like concreteness, imageability, and iconicity, social word features are predictive of vocabulary acquisition. These findings highlight an overlap in word features that influence learning in autistic and non-autistic children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.