Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41594966›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

The Impact of Test Anxiety and Cognitive Stress on Error-Related Brain Activity.

Zhenni Jin, Fangfang Long, Hua Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhenni JinDepartment of Psychology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China.
Fangfang LongSchool of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China.ORCID 0009-0007-9197-2671
Hua WeiDepartment of Psychology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215000, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0645-4428

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 32300884Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province BK20230652Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province SJCX24_1834
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Test anxiety is considered to affect individuals' cognitive control and task performance, particularly in error monitoring. While previous research has explored the relationship between anxiety and cognitive performance, this study aims to investigate the impact of test anxiety and cognitive stress on error processing, focusing on changes in error-related negativity (ERN). Participants were divided into high test anxiety (HTA) and low test anxiety (LTA) groups based on their scores on the Test Anxiety Scale (TAS). Cognitive stress was induced by administering the Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices test, accompanied by instructions that emphasized score comparison with others. Participants completed the Subjective Test Anxiety Scale (STAS), the Short State Anxiety Inventory (SSAI), and a Flanker task before and after the stress manipulation. The effectiveness of the stress manipulation was confirmed by significant increases in STAS and SSAI scores and changes in behavioral performance. EEG data were recorded to analyze ERN, correct-response negativity (CRN), and ΔERN (ERN minus the CRN) amplitudes. HTA individuals exhibited a trend toward larger ERN amplitudes than LTA counterparts, indicating heightened sensitivity to errors. However, no significant changes in ERN amplitudes were observed between pre- and post-stress conditions. CRN and ΔERN amplitudes also showed no significant differences across anxiety groups or stress conditions. ERN changes appear to be more closely related to trait test anxiety than to transient stress.

Indexed as

cognitive stressERNFlanker tasktest anxiety

Identifiers

PMID41594966
PMCPMC12837767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.