ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Further Evaluation of Youth Mental and Behavioral Health in Rural Communities.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Mental and behavioral healthcare (MBH) needs of youth have been increasingly recognized over the past decade. Youth living in rural areas of the United States face a particular challenge in accessing appropriate MBH services. However, the individual needs of communities vary. The current study recruited 32 caregivers, healthcare providers, and educators from four rural communities in one state in the Mountain West region of the United States. These participants responded to questions during a 45-60-min focus group. The goal of the focus groups was to understand (a) how caregivers, healthcare providers, and educators perceive the types of MBH services that are available in their community; (b) what barriers they perceive to accessing satisfactory MBH services; and (c) what strengths they perceive within their community's MBH system. Results of a thematic analysis of focus group transcripts found common and conflicting themes that likely have an impact on the development of an effective MBH system for rural youth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.